Right on cue, Jessica Valenti has published an article in defense of voting for Hillary Clinton???a vapid, intensely disingenuous piece that she can now add to a growing collection. Valenti argues that the election of a female president would ?benefit women?, and that criticism stems from what she calls Clinton?s ?unabashed embrace of women?s issues?, and those who take issue with Clinton being a woman. I am not arguing that Valenti is unintentionally misleading her readers but that this is deliberate and formulaic; she is following the unoriginal pattern already mastered by others like Amanda Marcotte and Sady Doyle???they omit in order to misrepresent.